The Middle Belt Forum (MBF) has expressed strong opposition to a proposed bill that seeks to make the Sultan of Sokoto a permanent co-chairman of the National Council for Traditional Rulers of Nigeria. According to MBF's National Spokesman, Luka Binniyat, the proposal is unacceptable due to historical, cultural, constitutional, and moral grounds.
Reasons for Opposition
- *Historical Juniority*: The Sokoto Sultanate is considered historically junior to Middle Belt monarchies, with ancient kingdoms and confederacies in the Middle Belt predating the Sokoto Caliphate.
- *Religious Leadership*: The Sultan's primary role as spiritual head of Nigerian Muslims makes his permanent leadership in a secular council problematic.
- *Secular Character*: The proposal violates Nigeria's secular character, cultural heritage, and federal structure by promoting religious supremacy.
Implications of the Bill
If the bill passes with the contentious clause, the MBF has threatened to ¹ ²:
- *Boycott Participation*: Mobilize all ethnic nationalities across the Middle Belt to boycott participation in the Council.
- *Form Autonomous Council*: Establish an autonomous Council of Middle Belt Traditional Rulers reflecting the historical, cultural, and moral values of the Middle Belt people.
Alternative Proposal
The MBF suggests a rotational chairmanship that cuts across all geo-political zones or ethnic blocs to preserve national unity, equity, and fairness ².
Conclusion
The Middle Belt Forum's opposition highlights the complexities of Nigeria's traditional institutions and the need for inclusivity and fairness in national representation. The outcome of this bill will have significant implications for the country's traditional leadership structure and national unity ³.
